Ayana is arguing that kohlberg's moral reasoning scale is not valid (that is, it does not accurately reflect real-world morality). based specifically on the text critique, which is not a critique ayana can make?
If it is based on a text critique in regards of Ayana’s
arguments with the moral reasoning of Kohlberg, a text that Ayana can make is
to propose about having to say of targeting everyone in means of saying that
they routinely cheat and lies as this is a form of not considered to be a text
critique because it is not establishing or differentiating or specifying of the information
of the moral reasoning of Kohlberg.
