malasha72 malasha72
  • 21-01-2022
  • Business
contestada

Why should relevant costs be reflected in the objective function but not sunk costs?

Respuesta :

dakotalopez37
dakotalopez37 dakotalopez37
  • 21-01-2022

Answer:

Sunk costs (past costs) or committed costs are not relevant. Sunk, or past, costs are monies already spent or money that is already contracted to be spent. A decision on whether or not a new endeavour is started will have no effect on this cash flow, so sunk costs cannot be relevant.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

The key to understanding any legal document is knowing the vocabulary and the form. True or False?
are lipids soluble or insoluble in water?
Help... I'm not sure about these...
82% written as a fraction in simplest form
I start with 0 points. i get 25 throws. i win 12 points for hitting the target and lose 8 points for each miss. i end with a score of 0. how many hits and misse
Raj drove his car 5 times farther than Gary drives his car. Together they drive 624 miles. How many miles does Raj drive?
Rewrite using positive exponents, (x^4) ^2
Which word in the sentence does the underlined phrase modify? The volunteer at the art museum can identify the title, artist, and date of every painting. A.
Martha collected 363 cans Diego collected 295. how many cans did Marta and Diego collect
37.5% of what number is 96