princesslori
princesslori princesslori
  • 18-09-2016
  • History
contestada

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Respuesta :

shadowfall
shadowfall shadowfall
  • 18-09-2016
Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

PLEASE HELP !! ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST !!
If 8.045 kilometers is about 5 miles, about how many kilometers is 13 miles? Round your answer to the nearest hundredth if necessary.​
please help I will appreciate it
What's the value of[tex] \sqrt{25 \times 1} [/tex]​
If a1=7and an=-2an1 then find the value of a5
Most managers believe that although it is possible to connect logistics decisions to costs, the connection to revenue enhancement is difficult to impossible. Pr
complete the sentences using phrases &name the type of phrase used 1) have you ever seen an elephant _______________ skin ?2) The building was flying the __
Use the box method to distribute and simplify (-x + 3)(4x + 4). Drag and drop the terms to the correct locations of the table.
25 points!! Will give Brainliest What is the molarity of the dilute solution if you dilute 35.0 mL of a 12.0 M solution to make 1000.0 mL of a solution?
when writing a cover letter should I write Sincerely at the end of the letter or not?